引言

新GRE写作部分旨在测试考生分析、评估和表达复杂观点的能力。要想在这一部分取得高分，考生不仅需要掌握基本的写作技巧，还需要熟悉官方题库中的范文，从中学习如何有效地组织论点、论证和结构。本文将深入解析新GRE写作的核心技巧，并结合官方题库中的范文进行详细分析。

新GRE写作核心技巧

1. 理解题目要求

在开始写作之前，首先要确保完全理解题目要求。新GRE写作题目通常分为两个部分：Issue Task和Argument Task。Issue Task要求考生对特定话题提出自己的观点，而Argument Task则要求考生评估给定的论证并提出论据。理解题目要求是确保写作内容准确无误的关键。

2. 构建论点

在写作过程中，构建有力的论点是至关重要的。以下是一些构建论点的技巧：

  • 明确立场：在Issue Task中，明确表明自己的立场；在Argument Task中，指出作者的观点。
  • 逻辑性强：论点应具有逻辑性，确保每个论点都有充分的证据支持。
  • 多样性：使用多种论据，如事实、例子、逻辑推理等，来支持自己的观点。

3. 组织结构

一篇优秀的GRE写作文章应具备清晰的结构。以下是一些组织结构的建议：

  • 引言：简要介绍话题，明确自己的立场或对作者观点的评价。
  • 主体段落：每个段落应围绕一个主题展开，支持自己的观点或反驳作者的论点。
  • 结论：总结全文，重申自己的观点，并提出进一步的思考。

4. 语言表达

语言表达是GRE写作评分的重要因素之一。以下是一些建议：

  • 准确性：确保使用正确的语法和拼写。
  • 多样性：使用丰富的词汇和句式，避免重复。
  • 清晰度：表达要简洁明了，避免歧义。

官方题库范文深度解析

以下是对新GRE写作官方题库中两个典型范文的深度解析：

1. Issue Task

题目：Some people believe that the best way to improve the quality of education in schools is to hire more teachers. Others believe that the best way to improve the quality of education is to improve the quality of the textbooks used in schools.

范文：

In my opinion, both increasing the number of teachers and improving the quality of textbooks are crucial for improving the quality of education in schools. However, I believe that improving the quality of textbooks is more effective.

Firstly, textbooks are the primary source of information for students. High-quality textbooks provide accurate and up-to-date information, which helps students acquire the necessary knowledge and skills. On the other hand, while hiring more teachers can increase the individual attention each student receives, it does not necessarily lead to improved learning outcomes.

Secondly, improving the quality of textbooks can have a more significant impact on a larger number of students. Textbooks are used by many students, and a single well-crafted textbook can benefit an entire class or even an entire school. In contrast, the benefits of hiring more teachers are limited to the students they directly teach.

Finally, improving the quality of textbooks can encourage teachers to be more creative in their teaching methods. When teachers have access to high-quality textbooks, they are more likely to explore different approaches to teaching, which can lead to a more engaging and effective learning experience.

In conclusion, while hiring more teachers is important, I believe that improving the quality of textbooks is the more effective approach to improving the quality of education in schools.

2. Argument Task

题目：The following appeared in a memo from the director of a company that designs and builds office buildings.

“Last year, we completed a new office building for a major client. The building was designed to provide natural light to every office and to have a separate outdoor garden area for employees. The client reported that the building was significantly more productive than its previous office. We should build more buildings in the same style for all our clients.”

范文：

The argument suggests that the new office building designed for the client last year was significantly more productive than the client’s previous office. The argument concludes that the design of this building, which includes natural light and an outdoor garden area for employees, is the reason for the increased productivity. However, the argument is not convincing because it overlooks several potential factors that could have contributed to the increased productivity.

Firstly, the argument does not consider the possibility that the increased productivity could be due to other factors, such as the company’s new business strategy or changes in the industry. The argument assumes that the building design is solely responsible for the improved productivity, without considering other variables.

Secondly, the argument does not provide any evidence to support the claim that the design of the building directly led to the increased productivity. While it is true that the building was designed to provide natural light and an outdoor garden area, the argument does not establish a causal relationship between these features and the improved productivity.

Lastly, the argument assumes that the design of the building is universally applicable to all clients. However, it is possible that the design may not be suitable for all companies, as each company has unique needs and preferences.

In conclusion, the argument is not persuasive because it does not provide sufficient evidence to support its conclusion. To determine whether the design of the building is the primary reason for the increased productivity, further research and analysis are needed.

总结

通过掌握新GRE写作的核心技巧，并结合官方题库中的范文进行深度解析，考生可以有效地提高自己的写作能力。在备考过程中，要注重理解题目要求、构建有力的论点、组织清晰的结构以及运用准确的语言表达。只有这样，才能在新GRE写作部分取得优异的成绩。